Below is an example of a Superintendent Evaluation Form (from Iowa) that TUSD might consider revising and using for its own needs (see post titled TUSD Policy Code: IGA and the Supt.). I particularly like the Reflective Conversation: Possible questions board members could ask section.
Please comment with your thoughts if you have the chance--what do you think of the standards? Would you add or remove anything?
Superintendent Leadership
Performance Review:
A Systems Approach
Developed
by and for Iowa school leaders with support from the Iowa Association of School
Boards, School Administrators of Iowa and The Wallace Foundation
This model
process is designed to promote a reflective conversation between school board
members and their superintendent. This collaborative approach is for the
purpose of improvement of performance of both the superintendent and the system
so that student achievement increases.
Sample
1: Superintendent Evaluation Form
Part I - Job Responsibilities
Standard 1: An educational leader promotes the
success of all students by facilitating the development, articulation,
implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and
supported by the school community. (Shared Vision)
The
descriptors supporting each criterion are provided as examples of the kind of
activities/behaviors that would support the criterion. The descriptors are not
exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect that a superintendent
demonstrate competence on all descriptors. The artifacts listed are meant to
provide examples of evidence of work on the standards. The artifacts listed are
not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a superintendent to provide
all of the artifacts.
1a. In collaboration with
others, uses appropriate data to establish rigorous, concrete goals in the
context of student achievement and instructional programs.
Descriptors
|
E
Examples of Evidence/Artifacts
|
·
Identifies critical data elements with stakeholder
groups (e.g., teacher leaders, principals, School Improvement Advisory
Committee, Board, etc.).
· Ensures data-driven goals are set for the building and
district teams.
· Participates in planning process to establish
measurable goals with all stakeholders.
|
· Board
agendas/administrative team agendas
· Presentations to
groups, including teachers (shareholders/stakeholders)
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan actions for Annual Progress Report
· Board and
administrative goals
· Growth goals for
administrators
· Work with School
Improvement Advisory Committee (SIAC) (documentation)
· “Observational” data
from board, staff, etc.
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· Evidence of annual
review of district’s mission statement and alignment to practice
· Opening day
PowerPoint-type presentation
· Podcasts/video
communicating district vision and accomplishments
· Iowa Core Curriculum –
vision
· Collaborative sharing
of programs, etc. (agendas and minutes)
|
Descriptors
|
Examples of Evidence/Artifacts
|
· Ensures staff has access to information and/or examples
of current research and best practice.
· Aligns goals with current research and best practice
about high-quality instructional programs.
· Systematically engages stakeholders in discussions about
current research and best practice.
|
· Board
agendas/administrative team agendas
· Media –
Newsletter/paper articles/Web site
· Presentations to
groups, including teachers (shareholders/stakeholders)
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan actions for Annual Progress Report
· Board and
administrative goals
· Growth goals for
administrators
· Board policy and
administrative policy enforcement that’s reflective of a “new” vision with
supporting materials
· Participation on state,
regional, national initiatives (documentation)
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· Communication
“vehicles” that make the school vision visible to stakeholders including
using technology
· Opening day
PowerPoint-type presentation
· Podcasts/video
communicating district vision and accomplishments
· Collaborative sharing
of programs, etc. (agendas and minutes)
|
1c. Articulates and promotes
high expectations for teaching and learning.
Descriptors
|
Examples of Evidence/Artifacts
|
· Works with stakeholders to establish expectations for
teacher and student performance.
· Communicates and discusses expectations for teaching and
learning with stakeholders.
· Promotes the belief that all students will master
rigorous academic standards.
· Facilitates goal setting to improve student
achievement.
|
· Board agendas/administrative
team agendas
· Media –
Newsletter/paper articles/Web site
· Presentations to
groups, including teachers (shareholders/stakeholders)
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan actions for Annual Progress Report
· Board and
administrative goals
· Growth goals for
administrators
· Work with School
Improvement Advisory Committee (SIAC) (documentation)
· “Observational” data
from board, staff, etc.
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· Evidence of annual
review of district’s mission statement and alignment to practice
· Communication vehicles,
including using technology, that make the school vision visible to
stakeholders
· Opening day
PowerPoint-type presentation
· Podcasts/video
communicating district vision and accomplishments
· Iowa Core Curriculum –
vision
· Collaborative sharing
of programs, etc. (agendas and minutes)
|
Descriptors
|
Examples of Evidence/Artifacts
|
·
Ensures building-level goals and action plans are
consistent with district goals.
· Ensures curriculum, instruction, and assessment
alignment.
· Provides leadership for development of effective and
meaningful school improvement plan.
· Makes decisions and allocates resources to
support building and district goals.
|
· Board
agendas/administrative team agendas
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan actions for Annual Progress Report
· Board and
administrative goals
· Growth goals for
administrators
· Board policy and
administrative policy enforcement that’s reflective of a “new” vision with
supporting materials
· Work with School
Improvement Advisory Committee (SIAC) (documentation)
· “Observational” data
from board, staff, etc.
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· Evidence of annual
review of district’s mission statement and alignment to practice
· Opening day
PowerPoint-type presentation
· Podcasts/video
communicating district vision and accomplishments
· Iowa Core Curriculum –
vision
· Economic vision
(participation with community development groups)
· Collaborative sharing
of programs, etc. (agendas and minutes)
|
1e. Provides leadership for major
initiatives and change efforts.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Board
agendas/administrative team agendas
· Presentations to groups,
including teachers (shareholders/stakeholders)
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan actions for Annual Progress Report
· Board and
administrative goals
· Growth goals for
administrators
· Board policy and
administrative policy enforcement that’s reflective of a “new” vision with
supporting materials
· Work with School
Improvement Advisory Committee (SIAC) (documentation)
· Participation on state,
regional, national initiatives (documentation)
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· Evidence of annual
review of district’s mission statement and alignment to practice
· Communication
“vehicles” that make the school vision visible to stakeholders including
using technology
· Opening day
PowerPoint-type presentation
· Podcasts/video
communicating district vision and accomplishments
· Collaborative sharing
of programs, etc. (agendas and minutes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1f. Communicates effectively to various
stakeholders regarding progress with school improvement plan goals.
Descriptors
|
Examples of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Board
agendas/administrative team agendas
· Presentations to
groups, including teachers (shareholders/stakeholders)
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan actions for Annual Progress Report
· Board and
administrative goals
· Growth goals for
administrators
· Board policy and
administrative policy enforcement that’s reflective of a “new” vision with
supporting materials
· Work with School
Improvement Advisory Committee (SIAC) (documentation)
· Participation on state,
regional, national initiatives (documentation)
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· Evidence of annual
review of district’s mission statement and alignment to practice
· Communication vehicles,
including using technology, that make the school vision visible to
stakeholders
· Opening day
PowerPoint-type presentation
· Podcasts/video
communicating district vision and accomplishments
· Collaborative sharing
of programs, etc. (agendas and minutes)
|
Evidence:
Reflection:
Summary Rating oMeets
Standard oDoesn’t Meet Standard
Reflective
Conversation: Possible
questions board members could ask
Standard 1
The
questions provided are meant to guide the discussion between the superintendent
and the board. The questions are not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to
expect a superintendent to respond to all questions.
- As you reflect on your work implementing the
vision, what are some of the barriers you encountered and how did you
overcome them?
- In what ways are you maximizing resources to
support the vision?
- What are the connections between the district’s
initiatives, allocation of resources and student learning? (Success?
achievement?)
- How are you supporting the accomplishment of our
district’s vision?
- How does our student achievement data compare to
others?
- What are the factors that you believe will impact
our long-range vision?
- What is the approach you use to develop and
sustain the district’s vision?
- How widely known is the vision? How often do you
review it? What do you do to recommend policies and practices that reflect
the vision?
- Does our
vision reflect the culture and climate of our community?
Standard 2: An educational leader promotes the
success of all students by advocating, nurturing and sustaining a school
culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff
professional development. (Culture of Learning)
The
descriptors supporting each criterion are provided as examples of the kind of
activities/behaviors that would support the criterion. The descriptors are not
exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect that a superintendent
demonstrate competence on all descriptors. The artifacts listed are meant to
provide examples of evidence of work on the standards. The artifacts listed are
not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a superintendent to provide
all of the artifacts.
2a. Provides leadership for assessing,
developing and improving climate and culture.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Professional
Development Plan
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Reflective journals
· Written communications
· Surveys of
staff/community
· Meeting logs of times
with administrative staff/support staff
· Symbolic “pins,” other
symbols – celebrations, etc.
· Reports and
celebrations of student achievement to board and other audiences
· Iowa Youth Survey
results
· Log of school visits
and presentations
· Monthly calendar
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· ACT Student
Satisfaction Survey
· Distribution of
research to administrative team and teachers
· Documentation of
coaching and evaluation of principals
· Meaningful interpretive
reports of student achievement data delivered in lay language
· Diversity
training/awareness plan
· Bullying/harassment
programs
· Agendas and/or minutes
from community planning meetings, including key communicators meetings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Written communications
· Feedback from a wide
variety of stakeholders about performance as the superintendent
· Surveys of
staff/community
· Symbolic “pins,” other
symbols – celebrations, etc.
· Student achievement
data
· Reports and
celebrations of student achievement to board and other audiences
· Iowa Youth Survey
results
· Log of school visits
and presentations
· Documentation of
coaching and evaluation of principals
· Meaningful interpretive
reports of student achievement data delivered in lay language
· Agendas and/or minutes
from community planning meetings, including key communicators meetings
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Professional
Development Plan
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Reflective journals
· Agenda of learning
experiences of administrative teams
· Written communications
· Meeting logs of times
with administrative staff/support staff
· Student achievement
data
· Linkage of Iowa
Professional Development Model to student achievement goals (documentation)
· Evidence of teachers
examining student achievement data
· Monthly calendar
· Written proposals for
innovative practices
· Distribution of
research to administrative team and teachers
· Documentation of
coaching and evaluation of principals
· Trends in Career
Development Plan growth goals for teachers
· Administrative team
book study (agendas and minutes)
· iPod audible book study
· Leadership library
(documentation)
· ICC/national standards
implementation plan
· Agendas and/or minutes
from community planning meetings, including key communicators meetings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Professional
Development Plan
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Agenda of learning
experiences of administrative teams
· Written communications
· Feedback from a wide
variety of stakeholders about performance as the superintendent
· Meeting logs of times
with administrative staff/support staff
· Student achievement
data
· Evidence of teachers
examining student achievement data
· Iowa Youth Survey
results
· Log of school visits
and presentations
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· Written proposals for
innovative practices
· Distribution of
research to administrative team and teachers
· Documentation of
coaching and evaluation of principals
· Trends in Career Development
Plan growth goals for teachers
· Meaningful interpretive
reports of student achievement data delivered in lay language
· Administrative team
book study (agendas and minutes)
· iPod audible book study
· Iowa Core Curriculum
team attendance at AEA meeting, agendas of district ICC meetings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Professional
Development Plan
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Reflective journals
· Agenda of learning
experiences of administrative teams
· Written communications
· Meeting logs of times
with administrative staff/support staff
· Reports and
celebrations of student achievement to Board and other audiences
· Linkage of Iowa
Professional Development Model to student achievement goals (documentation)
· Evidence of teachers
examining student achievement data
· Log of school visits
and presentations
· Documentation of
coaching and evaluation of principals
· Trends in Career
Development Plan growth goals for teachers
· Meaningful interpretive
reports of student achievement data delivered in lay language
· Administrative team
book study (agendas and minutes)
· Iowa Core
Curriculum/national standards implementation plan
· Diversity
training/awareness plan
· Bullying/harassment
programs
· Agendas and/or minutes
from community planning meetings, including key communicators meetings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Professional
Development Plan
· Agenda of learning
experiences of administrative teams
· Written communications
· Feedback from a wide
variety of stakeholders about performance as the superintendent
· Meeting logs of times
with administrative staff/support staff
· Student achievement
data
· Linkage of Iowa
Professional Development Model to student achievement goals (documentation)
· Evidence of teachers
examining student achievement data
· Log of school visits
and presentations
· Monthly calendar
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· Written proposals for
innovative practices
· Distribution of
research to administrative team and teachers
· Trends in Career
Development Plan growth goals for teachers
· Meaningful interpretive
reports of student achievement data delivered in lay language
· Iowa Core Curriculum
team attendance at AEA meeting, agendas of district ICC meetings
· Iowa Core
Curriculum/national standards implementation plan
· Agendas and/or minutes
from community planning meetings, including key communicators meetings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Professional
Development Plan
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Reflective journals
· Agenda of learning experiences
of administrative teams
· Written communications
· Feedback from a wide
variety of stakeholders about performance as the superintendent
· Surveys of
staff/community
· Meeting logs of times
with administrative staff/support staff
· Student achievement data
· Linkage of Iowa
Professional Development Model to student achievement goals (documentation)
· Written proposals for
innovative practices
· Distribution of
research to administrative team and teachers
· Documentation of
coaching and evaluation of principals
· Meaningful interpretive
reports of student achievement data delivered in lay language
· Administrative team
book study (agendas and minutes)
· Attend state or
national conference (agendas and minutes)
· Iowa Core Curriculum
team attendance at AEA meeting, agendas of district ICC meetings
· Leadership library
(documentation)
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Professional
Development Plan
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Reflective journals
· Agenda of learning
experiences of administrative teams
· Written communications
· Feedback from a wide
variety of stakeholders about performance as the superintendent
· Surveys of
staff/community
· Meeting logs of times
with administrative staff/support staff
· Reports and
celebrations of student achievement to board and other audiences
· Evidence of teachers
examining student achievement data
· Log of school visits
and presentations
· Monthly calendar
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· Distribution of research
to administrative team and teachers
· Meaningful interpretive
reports of student achievement data delivered in lay language
· Administrative team
book study (agendas and minutes)
· Iowa Core Curriculum
team attendance at AEA meeting, agendas of district ICC meetings
· Iowa Core
Curriculum/national standards implementation plan
· Agendas and minutes
from “key communicator” – meetings in long-range planning committee from the
community
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Written communications
· Feedback from a wide
variety of stakeholders about performance as the superintendent
· Surveys of
staff/community
· Meeting logs of times
with administrative staff/support staff
· Reports and
celebrations of student achievement to board and other audiences
· Log of school visits and
presentations
· Administrative team
book study (agendas and minutes)
· iPod audible book study
· Attend state or
national conference (agendas and minutes)
· Iowa Core Curriculum
team attendance at AEA meeting, agendas of district ICC meetings
· Diversity training/awareness
plan
· Bullying/harassment
programs
· Agendas and/or minutes
from community planning meetings, including key communicators meetings
|
2j. Is highly visible and engaged in the
school community.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Professional
Development Plan
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Reflective journals
· Agenda of learning
experiences of administrative teams
· Written communications
· Feedback from a wide
variety of stakeholders about performance as the superintendent
· Surveys of
staff/community
· Meeting logs of times
with administrative staff/support staff
· Symbolic “pins,” other
symbols – celebrations, etc.
· Reports and celebrations
of student achievement to board and other audiences
· Log of school visits
and presentations
· Monthly calendar
· iPod audible book study
· Attend state or
national conference (agendas and minutes)
· Iowa Core Curriculum
team attendance at AEA meeting, agendas of district ICC meetings
· Agendas and/or minutes
from community planning meetings, including key communicators meetings
|
|
2k. Articulates the desired school
culture and shows evidence about how it is reinforced.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Professional
Development Plan
· Log of school visits
and conversations with staff (includes emails)
· Reflective journals
· Agenda of learning
experiences of administrative teams
· Written communications
· Feedback from a wide
variety of stakeholders about performance as the superintendent
· Surveys of
staff/community
· Symbolic “pins,” other
symbols – celebrations, etc.
· Reports and
celebrations of student achievement to Board and other audiences
· Linkage of Iowa
Professional Development Model to student achievement goals (documentation)
· Iowa Youth Survey
results
· Log of school visits
and presentations
· Monthly calendar
· Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan
· ACT Student
Satisfaction Survey
· Distribution of
research to administrative team and teachers
· Documentation of
coaching and evaluation of principals
· Administrative team
book study (agendas and minutes)
· iPod audible book study
· Iowa Core Curriculum
team attendance at AEA meeting, agendas of district ICC meetings
· Leadership library
(documentation)
· ICC/national standards
implementation plan
· Diversity
training/awareness plan
· Bullying/harassment
programs
· Agendas and/or minutes
from community planning meetings, including key communicators meetings
|
|
Evidence:
Reflection:
Summary Rating oMeets
Standard oDoesn’t Meet Standard
Reflective
Conversation: Possible
questions board members could ask
Standard 2
The
questions provided are meant to guide the discussion between the superintendent
and the board. They are not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a
superintendent to respond to all questions.
· How do you monitor the
culture and climate of the district? What are the key factors that you
consider? Possible key factors to consider:
o Alignment of quality
professional development for all staff
o Norms about
professionalism
o Staff turnover analysis
based on exit interviews
o Student discipline data
o Grievances
o Absentee rates (staff and
students)
o Beginning teacher
retention
o Staff honors/recognitions
and student recognitions
o Open enrollment data
o Student sub-group
profiles re: participation rates in activities
o Post-graduate surveys
o Student achievement data
o Student recognitions
· How do you support a
culture where everything is focused on student achievement?
· How do you ensure a
culture of equality and equity?
· What standards do you set
for your professional development and growth?
· How do you tell if the
resources we’re investing in professional development make a difference in
student achievement?
· What evidence can you
provide that we’re using the best research about quality professional
development?
Standard 3: An educational leader promotes the
success of all students by ensuring management of the organization, operations
and resources for a safe, efficient and effective learning environment. (Management)
The
descriptors supporting each criterion are provided as examples of the kind of
activities/behaviors that would support the criterion. The descriptors are not
exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect that a superintendent
demonstrate competence on all descriptors. The artifacts listed are meant to
provide examples of evidence of work on the standards. The artifacts listed are
not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a superintendent to provide
all of the artifacts.
3a. Complies with state and federal
mandates and local board policies.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Administrative
“calendar” – critical dates calendar (DE due dates, etc) and board
presentation cycle/annual reports
· Department of Education
site visit summative report
· Auditor’s report
· Grants received/applied
for – alignment to goals of the district; sustainability
· Induction plan of board
members for understanding of school finance (confidence of board members’
understanding)
· Academy of Board
Learning Experiences (ABLE) meetings attended
· Enrollment plans
· Policies/procedures for
management of funds
· “Categorical”
funds/budgets
· Emergency/Crisis Plans
· Hiring process
(guidelines, procedures, schedules)
· Employee handbooks
· Board meeting agendas
· School Comparisons
Chart from Iowa Association of School Boards
· Administrative team
meeting agendas
· Program evaluation and
process result
· Staff recruitment plan
· Evidence of
implementation of formal project management techniques
· Collaboration/sharing
incentives/opportunities for efficiency/effective learning (documentation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Administrative
“calendar” – critical dates calendar (DE due dates, etc) and board
presentation cycle/annual reports
· Department of Education
site visit summative report
· Induction plan of board
members for understanding of school finance (confidence of board members’
understanding)
· Enrollment plans
· Hiring process (guidelines,
procedures, schedules)
· Employee handbooks
· Board meeting agendas
· Administrative team
meeting agendas
· Program evaluation and
process result
· Staff recruitment plan
· Evidence of
implementation of formal project management techniques
· Student/staff training
– conflict resolution plans
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Administrative
“calendar” – critical dates calendar (DE due dates, etc) and board
presentation cycle/annual reports
· Department of Education
site visit summative report
· Auditor’s report
· Induction plan of board
members for understanding of school finance (confidence of board members’
understanding)
· Academy of Board
Learning Experiences (ABLE) meetings attended
· Facility plans
· Enrollment plans
· Policies/procedures for
management of funds
· “Categorical”
funds/budgets
· Emergency/crisis plans
· Hiring process
(guidelines, procedures, schedules)
· Employee handbooks
· Board meeting agendas
· School Comparisons
Chart from Iowa Association of School Boards
· Meeting records of
conversations with business manager about fiscal health
· “Second opinion” report
about financial health of the district
· Financial report card
· Administrative team
meeting agendas
· Program evaluation and
process result
· “Green school”
development plan
· Collaboration/sharing
incentives/opportunities for efficiency/effective learning (documentation)
· Plans to use technology
for communication
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Auditor’s report
· Grants received/applied
for – alignment to goals of the district; sustainability
· Induction plan of board
members for understanding of school finance (confidence of board members’
understanding)
· Academy of Board
Learning Experiences (ABLE) meetings attended
· Facility plans
· Enrollment plans
· Policies/procedures for
management of funds
· “Categorical”
funds/budgets
· Board meeting agendas
· School Comparisons
Chart from Iowa Association of School Boards
· Meeting records of
conversations with business manager about fiscal health
· “Second opinion” report
about financial health of the district
· Financial report card
· Administrative team
meeting agendas
· “Green school”
development plan
· Evidence of
implementation of formal project management techniques
· Student/staff training
– conflict resolution plans
· Collaboration/sharing
incentives/opportunities for efficiency/effective learning (documentation)
· Plans to use technology
for communication
|
|
|
|
3e.
Protects instructional time by designing and managing operational procedures to
maximize learning.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Administrative
“calendar” – critical dates calendar (DE due dates, etc) and board
presentation cycle/annual reports
· Department of Education
site visit summative report
· Emergency/crisis plans
· Employee handbooks
· Board meeting agendas
· Administrative team
meeting agendas
· Program evaluation and
process result
· Collaboration/sharing
incentives/opportunities for efficiency/effective learning (documentation)
· Plans to use technology
for communication
|
|
3f.
Communicates effectively with both internal and external audiences about the
operations of the school.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Administrative
“calendar” – critical dates calendar (DE due dates, etc.) and board
presentation cycle/annual reports
· Department of Education
site visit summative report
· Auditor’s report
· Induction plan of board
members for understanding of school finance (confidence of board members’
understanding)
· Facility plans
· Enrollment plans
· Policies/procedures for
management of funds
· “Categorical”
funds/budgets
· Emergency/crisis plans
· Hiring process
(guidelines, procedures, schedules)
· Employee handbooks
· Board meeting agendas
· Financial report card
· Administrative team
meeting agendas
· Program evaluation and
process result
· Staff recruitment plan
· Evidence of
implementation of formal project management techniques
· Student/staff training
– conflict resolution plans
· Collaboration/sharing
incentives/opportunities for efficiency/effective learning (documentation)
· Plans to use technology
for communication
|
|
|
|
Evidence:
Reflection:
Summary Rating oMeets
Standard oDoesn’t Meet Standard
Reflective
Conversation: Possible
questions board members could ask
Standard 3
The
questions provided are meant to guide the discussion between the superintendent
and the board. They are not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a
superintendent to respond to all questions.
- What strategies do you use to monitor the general
operations of the district?
- How do you identify areas for improvement?
- How do you ensure that the district’s general
operations support student achievement?
- How do you prioritize in a climate of scarce
resources?
- What can we do to support you?
- How does our financial data compare to other
schools of comparable size and demographics?
- How often do you have critical conversations with
the business manager about the financial health and financial safeguards
for the district?
- How does our budget support our educational
goals?
- What is the
protocol for addressing questions of financial health of the district?
Standard 4: An educational leader promotes the
success of all students by collaborating with families and community members,
responding to diverse community interests and needs and mobilizing community
resources. (Family and Community)
The
descriptors supporting each criterion are provided as examples of the kind of
activities/behaviors that would support the criterion. The descriptors are not
exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect that a superintendent
demonstrate competence on all descriptors. The artifacts listed are meant to
provide examples of evidence of work on the standards. The artifacts listed are
not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a superintendent to provide
all of the artifacts.
4a. Engages family and community by
promoting shared responsibility for student learning and support of the
education system.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Meeting logs/minutes of
task force meetings
· Level of volunteerism
(documentation)
· Parent-teacher
conference numbers
· Number of visits to Web
site
· Community survey
· Needs
assessments/satisfaction surveys/focus groups
· Election results that
impact tax levies
· Written communications
· Data on outreach
programs
· Collaborative partners
(documentation)
· Advisory board minutes
· Parenting classes -
numbers
· “House calls” – contact
with parents and partners (documentation)
· Open houses
(documentation)
· Membership and service
to service clubs (documentation)
· Participation in
youth-oriented organizations (documentation)
· Communications with
parents
· Minutes of the School
Improvement Advisory Committee meetings
· Civic group
presentations
· Formal and informal
community partnership agreements and plans
· Preschool – community
partnership plans
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Meeting logs/minutes of
task force meetings
· Level of volunteerism
(documentation)
· Parent-teacher
conference numbers
· Number of visits to Web
site
· Community survey
· Needs
assessments/satisfaction surveys/focus groups
· Written communications
· Data on outreach
programs
· Collaborative partners
(documentation)
· Advisory board minutes
· Participation in 6-year
plan for 8th graders (documentation)
· Parenting classes -
numbers
· Inter-agency agreements
· “House calls” – contact
with parents and partners (documentation)
· Open houses
(documentation)
· Membership and service
to service clubs (documentation)
· Participation in
youth-oriented organizations (documentation)
· Communications with
parents
· Minutes of the School
Improvement Advisory Committee meetings
· Civic group
presentations
· Formal and informal
community partnership agreements and plans
· Preschool – community partnership
plans
· Adult learning
opportunities (documentation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Meeting logs/minutes of
task force meetings
· Community survey
· Written communications
· Data on outreach
programs
· Collaborative partners
(documentation)
· Advisory board minutes
· Parenting classes -
numbers
· Inter-agency agreements
· Membership and service
to service clubs (documentation)
· Participation in
youth-oriented organizations (documentation)
· Communications with
parents
· Civic group
presentations
· Formal and informal
community partnership agreements and plans
· Preschool – community
partnership plans
|
4d.
Collaboratively establishes a culture that welcomes and honors families and
community and seeks ways to engage them in student learning.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Meeting logs/minutes of
task force meetings
· Parent-teacher
conference numbers
· Number of visits to Web
site
· Community survey
· Needs
assessments/satisfaction surveys/focus groups
· Written communications
· Data on outreach
programs
· Collaborative partners
(documentation)
· Advisory board minutes
· Parenting classes -
numbers
· “House calls” – contact
with parents and partners (documentation)
· Open houses
(documentation)
· Membership and service
to service clubs (documentation)
· Participation in
youth-oriented organizations (documentation)
· Communications with
parents
· Minutes of the School
Improvement Advisory Committee meetings
· Civic group
presentations
· Formal and informal
community partnership agreements and plans
· Preschool – community
partnership plans
· Adult learning
opportunities (documentation)
|
|
|
|
Evidence:
Reflection:
Summary Rating oMeets
Standard oDoesn’t Meet Standard
Reflective
Conversation: Possible
questions board members could ask
Standard 4
The
questions provided are meant to guide the discussion between the superintendent
and the board. They are not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a
superintendent to respond to all questions.
- What data do you have that indicates the level of
meaningful parent involvement in their children’s education?
- What steps have you taken to initiate community
partnerships based on district goals? What are the results of the
initiatives?
- How do you reach out to disengaged parents in particular?
- In what ways do you use your leadership skills to
have a positive effect on the community?
- What do you do with the data we get from surveys,
needs assessments, etc.?
- What do you
do to model to the families in our district a healthy balance between
professional and personal responsibilities?
Standard 5: An educational leader promotes the
success of all students by acting with integrity, fairness and in an ethical
manner. (Ethics)
The
descriptors supporting each criterion are provided as examples of the kind of
activities/behaviors that would support the criterion. The descriptors are not
exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect that a superintendent
demonstrate competence on all descriptors. The artifacts listed are meant to provide
examples of evidence of work on the standards. The artifacts listed are not
exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a superintendent to provide all
of the artifacts.
5a. Demonstrates ethical and
professional behavior.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Record of solicitation
of feedback
· Customer satisfaction
indices
· Special Education
delivery plan
· Written recommendations
on difficult issues
· “Equity” district-wide
program results
· Character education
program data
· Affirmative Action Plan
· Background checks
verification
· Notes from state
officials
· Advisory council
minutes
· Staff handbook
· PBS – Positive Behavior
Supports – control/theory/SAFE/Olweus/CHAMPS implementation plans
· Evidence of
relationship building (notes, cards, e-mails, etc.)
· Development of wikis,
blogs, etc. to collect feedback on specific issues in the district
· IHSAA sportsmanship
data/ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
5b.
Demonstrates values, beliefs and attitudes that inspire others to higher levels
of performance.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Feedback from a variety
of stakeholders
· Record of solicitation
of feedback
· Customer satisfaction
indices
· Special Education
delivery plan
· Written recommendations
on difficult issues
· “Equity” district-wide
program results
· Character education
program data
· Affirmative Action Plan
· Advisory council
minutes
· PBS – Positive Behavior
Supports – control/theory/SAFE/Olweus/CHAMPS implementation plans
· Evidence of
relationship building (notes, cards, emails, etc.)
· Development of wikis,
blogs, etc. to collect feedback on specific issues in the district
· IHSAA sportsmanship
data/ratings
|
|
|
|
5c.
Fosters and maintains caring professional relationships with staff.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Feedback from a variety
of stakeholders
· Record of solicitation
of feedback
· Customer satisfaction
indices
· “Equity” district-wide
program results
· Background checks
verification
· Staff handbook
· Coaches/activities
handbook
|
|
|
|
5d.
Demonstrates appreciation for and sensitivity to diversity in the school
community.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Feedback from a variety
of stakeholders
· Customer satisfaction
indices
· Special Education
delivery plan
· Written recommendations
on difficult issues
· “Equity” district-wide
program results
· Character education
program data
· Affirmative Action Plan
· Advisory council
minutes
· Staff handbook
· Coaches/activities
handbook
· Evidence of
relationship building (notes, cards, e-mails, etc.)
· Development of wikis,
blogs, etc. to collect feedback on specific issues in the district
|
5e.
Is respectful of divergent opinions.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Feedback from a variety
of stakeholders
· Record of solicitation
of feedback
· Written recommendations
on difficult issues
· “Equity” district-wide
program results
· Affirmative Action Plan
· Notes from state
officials
· Advisory council
minutes
· Staff handbook
· Coaches/activities
handbook
· Evidence of
relationship building (notes, cards, e-mails, etc.)
· Development of wikis,
blogs, etc. to collect feedback on specific issues in the district
|
Evidence:
Reflection:
Summary Rating oMeets
Standard oDoesn’t Meet Standard
Reflective
Conversation: Possible
questions board members could ask
Standard 5
The
questions provided are meant to guide the discussion between the superintendent
and the board. They are not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a
superintendent to respond to all questions.
- How do you apply ethical decision-making with
staff, students, parents and other stakeholders?
- How do you confront and resolve any ethical issue
that arises re: interactions between staff, staff and students, students
and students, board to board, board to school personnel, board to
community?
- What strategies do you employ when dealing with
ethical issues such as treating all kids equitably, ensuring that
under-performing kids are given extra supports, creating a safe learning
environment for all kids, etc.?
- How do you model integrity, fairness and ethical
behavior?
- When have you drawn an ethical “line in the
sand”?
- What evidence can you provide that your decisions
are based on the “greater good” of all kids and the system?
- What values and beliefs are central to how you
approach ethical dilemmas?
- What
standards do you set for yourself for your own professional development
and growth?
Standard 6: An educational leader promotes the
success of all students by understanding the profile of the community and,
responding to, and influencing the larger political, social, economic, legal
and cultural context. (Societal Context)
The
descriptors supporting each criterion are provided as examples of the kind of
activities/behaviors that would support the criterion. The descriptors are not
exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect that a superintendent
demonstrate competence on all descriptors. The artifacts listed are meant to
provide examples of evidence of work on the standards. The artifacts listed are
not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a superintendent to provide
all of the artifacts.
6a. Collaborates with service providers
and other decision-makers to improve teaching and learning.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Communication logs with
legislators
· Agendas from meetings
–Area Education Agency, Board meetings, meetings with legislators, etc.
· Participation in
“non-school” initiatives, e.g., economic development, Chambers, Empowerment
(documentation)
· Participation in
professional associations such as School Administrators of Iowa and Iowa
Association of School Boards (documentation)
· Participation in
state-level task forces (documentation)
· Involvement with
community colleges, institutions of higher education, post-secondary
institutions (documentation)
· Inter-Agency agreements
· Involvement with
“school safety” organizations (documentation)
· AEA schools
collaboration (agendas and minutes)
· Conference association
(agendas and minutes)
· Participation in
social/fraternal organizations (documentation)
· Work with city council
on city/school initiatives (documentation)
|
|
|
|
6b. Advocates for the welfare of all
members of the learning community.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Communication logs with
legislators
· Participation in
“non-school” initiatives, e.g., economic development, Chambers, Empowerment
(documentation)
· Participation in
professional associations such as School Administrators of Iowa and Iowa
Association of School Boards (documentation)
· Participation in
state-level task forces (documentation)
· Involvement with
community colleges, institutions of higher education, post-secondary
institutions (documentation)
· Inter-agency agreements
· Participation in
social/fraternal organizations (documentation)
· Work with city council
on city/school initiatives (documentation)
|
|
6c. Designs and implements appropriate
strategies to reach desired goals.
Descriptors
|
Examples
of Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
· Agendas from meetings
–Area Education Agency, Board meetings, meetings with legislators, etc.
· Participation in
“non-school” initiatives, e.g., economic development, Chambers, Empowerment
(documentation)
· Participation in
state-level task forces (documentation)
· Inter-agency agreements
· Involvement with
“school safety” organizations (documentation)
· Participation in
social/fraternal organizations (documentation)
· Work with city council
on city/school initiatives (documentation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence:
Reflection:
Summary Rating oMeets
Standard oDoesn’t Meet Standard
Reflective
Conversation: Possible
questions board members could ask
Standard 6
The
questions provided are meant to guide the discussion between the superintendent
and the board. They are not exhaustive nor would it be reasonable to expect a
superintendent to respond to all questions.
- What service providers are we working with or
networking with, and what is the impact of those efforts?
- What steps are you taking to collaborate with
other districts, institutions and organizations, and on what issues?
- What steps are you taking to ensure that our
students and organization will be prepared for the changing demographics
of our state and nation?
- What examples
of your efforts to advocate for our district, all students and for
education can you give us?
Job
Responsibilities
|
Meets
Standard
|
Does Not Meet
Standard
|
Standard 1
|
||
Standard 2
|
||
Standard 3
|
||
Standard 4
|
||
Standard 5
|
||
Standard 6
Significant Achievements:
Areas for Growth:
Superintendent Comments:
School Board President Comments:
Continuous Improvement Recommendation (mark one)
Professional
Growth Plan
Remediation Target(s)
Superintendent’s Signature:
__________________________________________ Date: _____________________
Evaluation Period: 20______ to 20______
Board
President’s Signature: __________________________________________ Date:
_____________________
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.